April, 2012


4
Apr 12

Campus Police Charge Berkeley Protestors Using Questionable Tactics

In an outrageous and audacious move, last month UC Berkeley officials charged 13 individuals for their role in the now infamous November 9th protest, which showed campus police brazenly beating peaceful protestors.

The 13 individuals are accused of resisting arrest, battery of an officer, remaining at the scene of a riot, and obstructing a person’s free movement in a public space. Given the fact that the entire crowd of students, faculty, and concerned citizens were all doing the same, it’s shocking to see these 13 individuals singled out.

“It raises questions,” said Linda Lye, Northern California ACLU board member, in an interview with the Daily Cal. “People were charged with obstructing officers, but if you look at the video evidence, it seems like the whole crowd was doing that — so why were these individuals singled out?”

Ramon Quintero, one of the 13 accused, argued that the charges were politically motivated.

“One commonality between the 13 is that we are known organizers and activists,” Quintero said. “We organize students, and (the university doesn’t) want that. It’s a political witch hunt.”

“The people being charged are the people police were caught beating on videotape — this is retaliation, and the police and administration are trying to cover up their wrongdoing by trying to charge those of us who were victimized,” added Yvette Felarca, an organizer with BAMN and one of the 13 accused.

Adding further controversy to the announcement, campus officials charged the individuals after the protests by studying video footage to identify them. In addition, the campus health center reported to the police the identities of protestors who went to the center seeking medical treatment.

For more on the story, head over to the Daily Cal.


2
Apr 12

The Ugly Numbers

The New York Times did a recent study on the fate of the graduates of the Class of 2011 and unfortunately the results were not promising.

Unemployment among liberal-arts graduates was at 9.4 percent, higher than the national average, and with the average amount of student loan debt at $25,000, things are pretty bleak for recent grads. Jobs have not been plentiful and many students are either unemployed or working part-time jobs that don’t require a college degree.

In particular, the Times examined the fate of Drew University’s Class of 2011 and found that success in the job market was most closely related to family connections, networking skills, field of study, and luck, rather than GPAs or persistence.

Here’s a closer look at the numbers:

“17% of our sample of Drew University’s Class of 2011 is unemployed. 39% have full-time jobs, including six who have both full- and part-time jobs. 35% of students who are employed part time have two or more jobs. 74% of students who are interning are unpaid. 22% of students are in graduate school. 34% of jobs involve food service, retail, customer service, clerical or unskilled work.”

To read more about the Class of 2011, head over to the New York Times.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...